Image description
| — ¶¶Òõ¾«Æ·/ Mehedi Haque

IN THE late 1920s, the world witnessed the collapse of the Weimar Republic, and with it, the German economy fell into disarray. Hyperinflation, a collapsed banking system, and massive social unrest paved the way for the rise of the Nazi regime — a stark reminder of how economic instability can lead to catastrophic socio-political outcomes. The lessons from history serve as a reminder that when financial systems are left to deteriorate, the consequences ripple far beyond the economy, shaking the foundations of society itself.

Today, Bangladesh stands at a critical crossroads, as its fragile banking sector faces mounting pressures that could destabilise the nation’s socio-economic fabric. Over the past decade, persistent malpractices, corruption, weak governance, and an alarming rise in non-performing loans have eroded trust in the financial system. Without decisive intervention, the country risks plunging into an economic crisis that could severely hamper business activities, deter investment, and ultimately harm ordinary citizens.


To avert such a crisis, the government, alongside the central bank, must urgently implement a series of targeted macroeconomic and structural reforms. These measures should focus on restoring confidence, ensuring liquidity, and safeguarding the long-term sustainability of the financial sector. Various strategic options, such as quantitative easing, capital injections, and targeted bailouts, should be considered to tackle the sector’s fragility.

Ìý

Quantitative easing as a liquidity tool

ONE potential policy option is quantitative easing, a tool that has been used effectively by central banks worldwide during times of economic crisis. By purchasing long-term financial assets such as government bonds or high-quality bank assets, the central bank could inject much-needed liquidity into the banking system. The primary goal of QE would be to lower interest rates, expand the money supply, and provide struggling banks with the capital they need to meet withdrawal demands and expand credit to businesses and consumers.

This influx of liquidity would help avert a potential credit crunch, which would otherwise stifle investment and economic growth. However, QE must be implemented cautiously, as excessive liquidity could lead to inflationary pressures and a depreciation of the national currency. A carefully managed QE program could provide breathing space for banks to stabilise while spurring broader economic recovery.

Ìý

Government bailouts: a delicate balancing act

IN EXTREME cases of banking sector insolvency, where liquidity issues evolve into solvency crises, the government may need to consider direct bailouts. A bailout involves the injection of government funds into struggling banks to prevent their collapse and restore solvency. While controversial, especially given the mismanagement and corruption that have plagued many of these institutions, a bailout may be a necessary measure to prevent widespread financial chaos.

However, any bailout must come with stringent conditions. These conditions should include the restructuring of management teams, the implementation of stronger governance protocols, and mechanisms for improved accountability. The failures of many banks in Bangladesh can be traced back to poor governance, political interference, and inadequate risk management practices. A bailout without addressing these root causes would only serve as a temporary bandage over a deeper wound.

To ensure the effective use of public funds, the government could implement a ‘good bank, bad bank’ model. In this approach, bad assets, primarily NPLs, would be transferred to a ‘bad bank’ for specialised management and eventual liquidation. This would allow the ‘good banks’ to focus on their core business operations without being burdened by toxic assets. By isolating bad loans, these institutions could rebuild trust and attract new capital for growth.

Ìý

Addressing non-performing loans

ONE of the most pressing issues plaguing Bangladesh’s banking sector is the high level of NPLs, which have severely impacted the profitability and sustainability of many banks. These NPLs, often politically backed and devoid of effective recovery mechanisms, have become a systemic issue. To address this, the central bank must adopt stricter regulatory measures and implement legal reforms to expedite the recovery of defaulted loans.

In the short term, creating a dedicated asset management company to manage these toxic assets is essential. By isolating NPLs in a centralised entity, banks would be able to focus on rebuilding their balance sheets and pursuing profitable growth opportunities. Additionally, the central bank could incentivise banks to sell off their bad loans at discounted rates to specialised asset management firms, which would be tasked with the recovery and resolution of these distressed assets.

Ìý

Transparency and restoring confidence

ONE of the greatest dangers facing Bangladesh’s banking system is the erosion of public trust. If depositors lose confidence in the safety of their funds, the risk of widespread withdrawals could trigger a liquidity crisis, exacerbating the already fragile state of the sector. Clear and consistent communication from both the government and the central bank is essential to reassure the public that their deposits are safe and that concrete steps are being taken to stabilise the sector.

Ensuring transparency in the restructuring process, including regular updates on reforms, capital injections, and asset recovery efforts, will go a long way toward calming public fears. The introduction of deposit insurance schemes could further enhance depositor confidence by guaranteeing that their funds are protected, even in the event of a bank failure.

Bangladesh’s fragile banking sector presents a formidable challenge, but it also offers an opportunity for meaningful reform. By employing a combination of quantitative easing, targeted bailouts, bank mergers, and enhanced regulatory oversight, the government can restore stability to the financial sector and set the economy on a sustainable path to recovery. Addressing capital shortages, tackling NPLs, and ensuring transparency will not only rebuild public trust but also lay the foundation for long-term economic growth. Just as history has shown the perils of inaction, today’s policymakers must take bold, decisive steps to secure Bangladesh’s financial future.

Ìý

Md Junayed Hossain is a financial analyst.