FOR centuries, the polities located in the Bengal deltaÌý — the Bengal Sultanate, the Bengal subah, or the Bengal Presidency — have shared complex ties with Arakan (Rakhine State) and Burma (Myanmar). While there existed substantial trade links, cultural interaction and migration flows between the two regions, they also engaged in intermittent warfare, with the Arakanese/Burmese occasionally invading the current Chattogram division and the Bengalis periodically establishing protectorates over parts of the Rakhine State. In 1948, Myanmar obtained independence from the United Kingdom and the Rakhine State became one of its constituent parts. On its part, Bangladesh obtained its independence from the United Kingdom, as a constituent wing of Pakistan, in 1947 and from Pakistan in 1971.
Since 1971, a number of factors, including the protracted Rohingya refugee crisis, the continuous flow of drugs from Myanmar to Bangladesh, occasional border conflicts and silent strategic competition, have persistently overshadowed the potential benefits of a comprehensive economic partnership between the two states.
Ìý
Bangladesh–Myanmar relations
STATE-SANCTIONED campaigns of ethnic cleansing and inter-communal riots have resulted in the repeated flights of hundreds of thousands of Muslim-majority Rohingyas, largely concentrated in Myanmar’s northern Rakhine State, to Bangladesh in 1978, 1991–1997, 2012, 2015, 2016–2018 and 2024. Bangladesh now hosts about 1.4 million Rohingya refugees and the protracted crisis has imposed serious economic, political, social, environmental and security costs on the country. Meanwhile, decades of internal conflict, rampant corruption and failures of governance have turned Myanmar into a narco-state and Bangladesh has become a substantial market as well as a significant transit route for Myanmar-origin drugs such as methamphetamine (Yaba) tablets, crystal meth (Ice), and heroin. Bangladesh–Myanmar relations have periodically been characterised by border clashes, the killing and detention of Bangladeshi civilians, the violation of Bangladesh’s borders and Myanmar’s territorial claims over the St Martins Island. Accordingly, Bangladesh and Myanmar have been locked in a largely silent military-strategic competition, illustrated by their respective acquisitions of Chinese and Indian submarines.
Still, Myanmar holds unique geopolitical and geo-economic significance for Bangladesh. The geographically larger but comparatively less populated and less industrialised Myanmar is one of the top producers of rice and other agricultural products and contains substantial reserves of oil and natural gas. Hence, by forging a comprehensive economic partnership with Myanmar, Bangladesh can ensure its food and energy security to a large extent. Myanmar can be a large market for Bangladeshi industrial and agricultural products, including textiles, textile wastes, cement, pharmaceutical goods potatoes and fish. Moreover, complexities in Indo–Bangladeshi relations necessitate the implementation of a more active ‘look east’ policy for Dhaka and Myanmar serves as Bangladesh’s potential gateway to China and Southeast Asia. Hence, enhancing connectivity between the two states through developing infrastructure is beneficial for both.
Both Bangladesh and Myanmar are in turmoil now. After the 2024 uprising, Bangladesh is struggling with political instability, financial uncertainty, growing crimes and simmering unrest among religious and ethnic minorities. On its part, Myanmar’s situation is worse, with the degeneration of the country’s decades-long internal conflict into a full-scale civil war in 2021. The Myanmar government exerts stable control over only one-third of Myanmar’s territory. Ethnic armed organisations control more than 80 per cent and 85 per cent of the Rakhine and Chin States respectively, thus effectively controlling the entire length of the Bangladesh–Myanmar border.
Ìý
New Myanmar policy
FOR decades, Bangladesh has pursued an ad hoc policy vis-Ã -vis Myanmar and even the Rohingya crisis has failed to influence Dhaka to formulate a coherent set of policies towards its southeastern neighbour. Hence, Dhaka needs to formulate a pragmatic, flexible and systematic Myanmar policy for 2025 and onwards.
First, Bangladesh should prioritise the protection of its sovereignty, territorial integrity and national security over all other concerns, such as geo-economic interests, in dealing with Myanmar. In particular, Bangladesh should undertake necessary political and security measures to protect its citizens from the spillovers of the conflict in Myanmar, to prevent the violation of its land border, airspace, and maritime frontier, and preserve its control over all territories adjacent to the Myanmar border.
Second, while both Bangladesh and Myanmar can benefit from joint connectivity and infrastructure projects, such projects are unlikely to be realised unless a stable and secure government is established in Myanmar. Till then, Dhaka should adopt a policy of cautious economic engagement with Myanmar.
Third, the outcome of the Myanmar civil war is far from certain. So, Dhaka should maintain substantial contacts with all major stakeholders, including the Tatmadaw-controlled Myanmar government, the opposition National Unity Government, the United League of Arakan and its military wing Arakan Army, the ethnic armed organisations in the Chin State and the Rohingya organisations inside the Rakhine State. At the same time, Bangladesh should closely monitor the situation on the ground in Myanmar and adjust its policies on the basis of ground reality.
Fourth, drug trade has become enmeshed in Bangladesh’s political economy while drug abuse poses a serious threat to the state’s societal stability. Hence, Bangladesh should adopt and implement strict drug control policies to contain the drug epidemic. In this sphere, Dhaka should engage with all relevant actors in Myanmar and attempt to develop collaborative ties with them to prevent the smuggling of drugs into Bangladesh.
Fifth, the security of southeastern Bangladesh, in both its internal and external dimensions, is closely connected with the situation in Myanmar’s Rakhine and Chin States. So, Bangladeshi intelligence agencies should monitor the military-political situation in those two regions while the Bangladeshi military should prepare for all eventualities or contingencies arising out of Myanmar.
Finally, Bangladesh has so far resorted to extensive diplomatic measures, including bilateral dialogues, trilateral negotiations, multilateral mechanisms and international legal instruments, to ensure the repatriation of Rohingya refugees to Myanmar, but none of them has produced any fruitful result. Meanwhile, the Rakhine State is in a flux, with the Tatmadaw in retreat and the Arakan Army occupying more than 80 per cent of the region. The Arakan Army and its political wing United League of Arakan are not internationally recognised and it has struggled to effectively govern the war-torn region. Moreover, it has occupied the traditionally Rohingya-populated Maungdaw and Buthidaung townships in northern Rakhine State, but its forces have committed atrocities against the Rohingyas and its control over northern Rakhine State has come under challenge from the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army. Thus, the Rakhine State is currently facing a power vacuum.
Bangladesh should view the unfolding situation in the Rakhine State in a calculative manner and examine its options for facilitating the repatriation of the Rohingyas to northern Rakhine under the current circumstances. Having weighed all political, economic, strategic and diplomatic factors, the state should boldly push for the repatriation of the Rohingyas by leveraging the Tatmadaw’s current predicament and the Arakan Army’s lack of international legitimacy.
Under the current circumstances, challenges outweigh opportunities in relations between Bangladesh and Myanmar. Accordingly, Bangladesh should adopt and pursue a pragmatic, calculative and interest-driven Myanmar policy, with a particular emphasis on the prioritisation of national security, the containment of Myanmar-origin drug trade and the repatriation of the Rohingya refugees.
Ìý
Md Himel Rahman is a Dhaka-based freelance analyst on international and strategic affairs.