Image description

Yemen’s Iran-backed Huthi rebels said Tuesday that they had fired two missiles at Israel, hours after the Israeli military said it had intercepted a projectile launched from the country.

‘The first attack targeted Ben Gurion Airport’ in Tel Aviv, and the second was fired at a power station south of Jerusalem, a Huthi military statement said.


The rebels also said they had attacked the American aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman. There was no immediate comment from the US military.

Late on Monday, the Israeli military said it had shot down a missile launched from Yemen before it crossed into Israeli territory.

The Huthis, who control much of war-torn Yemen, have been firing missiles and drones at Israel, and at ships in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, in what they say is solidarity with Palestinians during the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip.

Last week, Israeli fighter jets carried out retaliatory strikes that killed four people at Sanaa international airport, where the World Health Organisation chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus was waiting for a flight.

Meanwhile, Israel’s devastating campaigns against Iran’s regional allies have severely weakened its arch-enemy’s ability to project its power, but Yemen’s Tehran-backed Huthi rebels remain a stubborn thorn in its side, analysts say.

With the ranks of Palestinian group Hamas and Lebanon’s Hezbollah decimated after more than a year of war, and with the fall of Bashar al-Assad in Syria removing a key link in Iran’s anti-Israel ‘axis of resistance’, the Huthis have emerged as Israel’s most immediate security concern.

The Shia Muslim rebel group controls much of Yemen, including the capital Sanaa, and has proven willing to repeatedly launch missile and drone attacks at Israel from afar, despite posing a limited threat to it militarily.

But their location nearly 2,000 kilometres away, combined with their broader destabilising influence — especially along vital Red Sea shipping lanes — complicates any potential Israeli response, particularly if undertaken unilaterally, analysts said.

‘Fighting the Huthis is a difficult endeavour for Israel for a number of reasons, the main being distance, which doesn’t allow for frequent strikes, and the lack of intelligence on the group,’ Michael Horowitz, head of intelligence for Le Beck, a Middle East-based geopolitical consultancy, said.

Like Hezbollah — which began trading cross-border fire with Israel after Hamas’s October 7 attack last year — the Huthis say they are acting in solidarity with the Palestinians, and have vowed to continue until there is a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip.

Horowitz said he expected Israel to adopt a strategy similar to its approach to Hezbollah, potentially targeting key Huthi leaders for assassination and disrupting smuggling routes as it did with repeated strikes in Lebanon and Syria.

However, he added, ‘There is no guarantee that this will restore deterrence.’

Despite causing minimal damage due to Israel’s advanced missile defence systems, the near-daily Huthi strikes in recent weeks have significantly disrupted civilian life in Israel.

In Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, air raid sirens blare frequently, forcing tens of thousands of residents to scramble into bomb shelters, often in the middle of the night.

While most of the missiles and drones launched from Yemen are intercepted, one missile this month wounded 16 people in Tel Aviv, Israel’s military and emergency services said.

In response, the Israeli air force has struck Huthi targets in Yemen including Sanaa’s international airport.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed Israel will sever ‘the terrorist arm of Iran’s axis of evil’, and Defence Minister Israel Katz has vowed to ‘hunt down all of the Huthis’ leaders’.

Israel’s key ally the United States has also carried out strikes against the Huthis to prevent the group’s repeated attacks on shipping in the Red Sea.

Analyst Yoel Guzansky was sceptical as to whether Israel would succeed in cowing the rebels.

‘The Huthis remain the only ones still firing at Israel on a daily basis and it’s a problem that is not easy to solve,’ said Guzansky, a senior fellow at the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University.

There was ‘no magic solution’, he added, because the Arab Gulf states that have also suffered from attacks by the Huthis are ‘afraid of an escalation’, compelling Israel to weigh its response carefully.

The Huthis ‘are a nuisance and a menace’, said Menahem Merhavy, a researcher at the Truman Institute at Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

While they posed only a ‘limited’ threat to Israel, they have caused disruptions to maritime commerce on a global scale, he said.

That could make a joint response more likely, especially once US President-elect Donald Trump takes office, Merhavy added.

During his previous term, Trump brokered groundbreaking normalisation agreements between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Morocco, known collectively as the Abraham Accords.

And the persistent Huthi threat meant further Arab-Israeli recognition was ‘definitely a possibility’, Merhavy said.

‘Iran has been so severely weakened and so severely exposed as vulnerable that I think it makes an agreement between Israel and Saudi Arabia more likely, especially if there’s going to be some kind of ceasefire in Gaza,’ he said.

But Mark Dubowitz, CEO of the Washington-based think tank the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, warned Iran and its proxies were down but not out.

Tehran, he said, ‘is skilled at regenerating its proxy networks’, and could step up its nuclear programme ‘as a deterrent’ against Israel and the United States.